• +91 94611 45335
  • greenfarming@gmail.com
International Journal of Applied Agricultural & Horticultural Sciences
  • 28 April, 2024
Indexing :
           
Journal’s Code
Frequency : Bimonthly
Language : English
DOI Prefix : 10.37322
P-ISSN : 0974-0775
E-ISSN : 2582-4198
NAAS Rating
: 3.85 (2021)
Total Papers
: 2640
Total Views
: 850346
Impact Factor
SJIF (2018) : 6.967
IP Index : 2.07
GIF (2016) : 0.468
IIFS : 2.035
Current Issue
Green Farming
Green Farming
Vision Messages
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Copyright (c) 2010 Reserved
Announcement
  • 1. Papers are invited for the forthcoming issues of Green Farming. Few Mini Review articles on applied aspects of new approaches (with Sr. Authors) may be adjusted, if sent on priority by email. For more details, please contact us.
Vol. 3 (1) : January-February 2012 issue
Green Farming Vol. 3 (1) : 42-44 (January-February, 2012)
An economic analysis of organic rice cultivation
D. NAGARAJ1 and B. CHINNAPPA2
Dept. of Agril. Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore - 560 065 (Karnataka)
Designation :  
1P.G. Student *(nagarajd54@gmail.com), 2Professor
Subject : Agriculture Economics, Agri-Business, Marketing & Statistics, Farm Management
Paper No. :
Total Pages : 3
Received : 13 September 2011
Revised accepted : 16 December 2011
Get Access
Citation :

D. NAGARAJ and B. CHINNAPPA. 2012. An economic analysis of organic rice cultivation. Green Farming Vol. 3 (1) : 42-44 ; January-February, 2012

ABSTRACT
The present investigation was undertaken in Shimoga district of Karnataka. The study is based on primary data obtained from 80 farmers; 40 each of organic and conventional farmers. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The cost of cultivation of organic rice was marginally lower at ` 10,158 than conventional rice cultivation (Rs. 11,564). Locally
available organic sources of nutrients such as FYM, other organic manures including sheep and goat manure were used
abundantly. Indiscriminate use of fertilizers and plant protection chemicals was noticed in conventional farming leading to
marginal increase in cost of cultivation. The yield of organic rice was 18.23 q while that conventional rice was 17.48. This
clearly suggested that organic rice farmers could obtain higher productivity using low cost organic rice technologies. This is an important message that needs to be disseminated to farming community to convince about potential benefits of organic rice.
Key words :
Economic analysis, organic rice, partial budgeting, resource use.