• +91 94611 45335
  • greenfarming@gmail.com
International Journal of Applied Agricultural & Horticultural Sciences
  • 29 April, 2024
Indexing :
           
Journal’s Code
Frequency : Bimonthly
Language : English
DOI Prefix : 10.37322
P-ISSN : 0974-0775
E-ISSN : 2582-4198
NAAS Rating
: 3.85 (2021)
Total Papers
: 2640
Total Views
: 852634
Impact Factor
SJIF (2018) : 6.967
IP Index : 2.07
GIF (2016) : 0.468
IIFS : 2.035
Current Issue
Green Farming
Green Farming
Vision Messages
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Copyright (c) 2010 Reserved
Announcement
  • 1. Papers are invited for the forthcoming issues of Green Farming. Few Mini Review articles on applied aspects of new approaches (with Sr. Authors) may be adjusted, if sent on priority by email. For more details, please contact us.
Vol. 7 (5) : September-October 2016 issue
Green Farming Vol. 7 (5) : 1148-1151 ; September-October, 2016
Comparative study of various irrigation methods in summer rice
ANAMIKA SONIT1*, A.L. RATHORE2, HEMLATA3, AMBIKA TANDON4 and G.P. BANJARA5
Deptt. of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur - 492 012 (Chhattisgarh)
Designation :  
1Farm Manager - KVK, Korba *(anamikasonit@gmail.com), 3SMS - KVK, Durg,
2Principal Scientist & Head, 4,5Asstt. Professor
Subject : Agronomy and Crop Production
Paper No. : P-4464
Total Pages : 4
Received : 09 November 2015
Revised accepted : 20 August 2016
Get Access
Citation :

ANAMIKA SONIT, A.L. RATHORE, HEMLATA, AMBIKA TANDON and G.P. BANJARA. 2016. Comparative study of various irrigation methods in summer rice. Green Farming Vol. 7 (5) : 1148-1151 ; September-October, 2016

ABSTRACT
An experiment was conducted at Research Farm, IGKV, Raipur (C.G.) during summer season 2013. Treatment consisted of two rice varieties (MTU1010 and IR64) as main plots and five drip irrigations (0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4 IW: CPE ratio (Irrigation Water and Cumulative Pan Evaporation Ratio), micro sprinkler irrigation once in three day and flooding as sub plots. Panicle length, panicle weight, sound grains penicle-1 and numbers of grains panicle-1 were statistically similar in drip irrigation at 1.4, 1.2 and 1.0 IW:CPE ratio and traditional flooding. The maximum seed yield was recorded in drip irrigation at 1.4 IW: CPE ratio which was at par to traditional flooding and drip irrigation at 1.2 IW: CPE ratio but these treatments were significantly superior over rest of the treatments. Drip irrigation at 1.4 IW: CPE ratio reduced input cost by 14% and increased net income by 33% over traditional flood irrigation. The water use was the maximum in flooding (3340 mm) followed by micro sprinkler irrigation (1417 mm) and drip irrigation at 1.4 (1300 mm), 1.2 (1152 mm) and 1.0 (948 mm) IW:CPE ratio. Drip irrigation at 1.4 and 1.2 IW:CPE ratio saved 63 and 59 percent of irrigation water respectively over flooding, indicating that cropped area under summer rice can be doubled with same quantity of available water by using drip irrigation without sacrificing grain yield.
Key words :
Drip irrigation, IW:CPE, Rice, Seed & straw yield, Summer rice, WUE.