• +91 94611 45335
  • greenfarming@gmail.com
International Journal of Applied Agricultural & Horticultural Sciences
  • 29 April, 2024
Indexing :
           
Journal’s Code
Frequency : Bimonthly
Language : English
DOI Prefix : 10.37322
P-ISSN : 0974-0775
E-ISSN : 2582-4198
NAAS Rating
: 3.85 (2021)
Total Papers
: 2640
Total Views
: 851325
Impact Factor
SJIF (2018) : 6.967
IP Index : 2.07
GIF (2016) : 0.468
IIFS : 2.035
Current Issue
Green Farming
Green Farming
Vision Messages
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Copyright (c) 2010 Reserved
Announcement
  • 1. Papers are invited for the forthcoming issues of Green Farming. Few Mini Review articles on applied aspects of new approaches (with Sr. Authors) may be adjusted, if sent on priority by email. For more details, please contact us.
Vol. 1 (5) : September-October 2010 issue
Green Farming Vol. 1 (5) : 497-498 (September-October, 2010) (New Series)
Constraints in pulses cultivation as perceived by the farmers
PARVEEN KUMAR1*, RAJINDER PESHIN2, M.S. NAIN3 and VIJAY KUMAR4
Division of Agricultural Extension Education, S.K. University of Agriculture Sciences & Technology - Jammu, Main Campus Chatha - 180 009 (J & K)
Designation :  
1,4Ph.D. Scholar, 2,3Associate Professor
Subject : Agriculture Extension Education
Paper No. :
Total Pages : 2
Received :
Revised accepted :
Get Access
Citation :

PARVEEN KUMAR, RAJINDER PESHIN, M.S. NAIN and VIJAY KUMAR. 2010. Constraints in pulses cultivation as perceived by the farmers. Green Farming Vol. 1 (5) : 497-498 ; September-October, 2010 (New Series)

ABSTRACT
A study of the four villages in Block Ranbir Singh Pura of District Jammu was conducted to know the various constraints faced by the farmers in cultivation of Pulses. The study revealed that that among the four major categories of constraints, institutional constraints were ranked I by the respondents with a mean percentage score (MPS) of 84.73. The other constraints reported were non availability of HYV seeds, unavailability of fertilizers, unavailability of plant protection chemicals at the time of sowing, low price of produce, lack of subsidy for inputs, lack of knowledge about seed rate, seed treatment, weed management dosage and method of fertilizer application.
Key words :
Categories of constraints, Infrastructure, Mean percentage score, Socio-economic, Technological constraints.