• +91 94611 45335
  • greenfarming@gmail.com
International Journal of Applied Agricultural & Horticultural Sciences
  • 28 April, 2024
Indexing :
           
Journal’s Code
Frequency : Bimonthly
Language : English
DOI Prefix : 10.37322
P-ISSN : 0974-0775
E-ISSN : 2582-4198
NAAS Rating
: 3.85 (2021)
Total Papers
: 2640
Total Views
: 850023
Impact Factor
SJIF (2018) : 6.967
IP Index : 2.07
GIF (2016) : 0.468
IIFS : 2.035
Current Issue
Green Farming
Green Farming
Vision Messages
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Copyright (c) 2010 Reserved
Announcement
  • 1. Papers are invited for the forthcoming issues of Green Farming. Few Mini Review articles on applied aspects of new approaches (with Sr. Authors) may be adjusted, if sent on priority by email. For more details, please contact us.
Vol. 9 (4) : July-August 2018 issue
Green Farming Vol. 9 (4) : 739-744 ; July-August, 2018
Design, development and performance evaluation of manually operated two row trolley tomato transplanter
KISHORSINH B. JHALA1*,  PANKAJ V. THORAT2  and  RAJESHKUMAR D. BANDHIYA3
Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Junagadh Agricultural University , Junagadh - 362 001 (Gujarat)
Designation :  
1Associate Professor  *(jhalakb1960@yahoo.com),  2,3Research Scholar
Subject : Agriculture Engineering, Farm Machinery, Energy & Power and Process Engineering
Paper No. : P-7343
Total Pages : 6
Received : 07 July 2018
Revised accepted : 23 July 2018
Get Access
Citation :

KISHORSINH B. JHALA, PANKAJ V. THORAT and RAJESHKUMAR D. BANDHIYA. 2018. Design, development and performance evaluation of manually operated two row trolley tomato transplanter. Green Farming  Vol. 9 (4) : 739-744 ; July-August, 2018

ABSTRACT
The transplanter was designed on the basis of morphological parameters, agronomical requirements and ergonomical consideration for transplanting two rows (4 seedlings) at a time. The jaw is main operational part of vegetable transplanter which was fitted at the bottom of hollow delivery tubes (4 numbers) for transplanting. Maximum field efficiency of 86.68 % was obtained for 4 weeks age of seedlings on bare bed. In general effective field capacity was found as 0.014 ha/h for 6 weeks age of seedlings on mulch bed. Minimum cost of operation 3690.91 ?/ha for 6 weeks age of seedlings on mulch bed. Maximum cost for transplanting 1000 seedlings using the vegetable transplanter was observed to be ? 114.43 as against ? 156.38 when done manually. Assuming an annual use of transplanter as 250 h, the payback period was found as 926.74 hours or 3.71 years.
Key words :
Age of seedlings, Cost of operation, Field efficiency, Tomato transplanter, Types of bed.