• +91 94611 45335
  • greenfarming@gmail.com
International Journal of Applied Agricultural & Horticultural Sciences
  • 27 April, 2024
Indexing :
           
Journal’s Code
Frequency : Bimonthly
Language : English
DOI Prefix : 10.37322
P-ISSN : 0974-0775
E-ISSN : 2582-4198
NAAS Rating
: 3.85 (2021)
Total Papers
: 2640
Total Views
: 848789
Impact Factor
SJIF (2018) : 6.967
IP Index : 2.07
GIF (2016) : 0.468
IIFS : 2.035
Current Issue
Green Farming
Green Farming
Vision Messages
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Copyright (c) 2010 Reserved
Announcement
  • 1. Papers are invited for the forthcoming issues of Green Farming. Few Mini Review articles on applied aspects of new approaches (with Sr. Authors) may be adjusted, if sent on priority by email. For more details, please contact us.
Vol. 5 (5) : September-October 2014 issue
Green Farming Vol. 5 (5) : 777-781 ; September-October, 2014
Influence of resource conservation technologies in maize- chickpea sequence cropping under Northern Transitional Zone of Karnataka
B.R. MANJITH KUMAR1* and S.S. ANGADI2
Deptt. of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad- 580 005 (Karnataka)
Designation :  
1Ph.D. Scholar *(manjeetkumar2007@gmail.com), 2Professor
Subject : Agronomy and Crop Production
Paper No. : P-1740
Total Pages : 5
Received : 28 March 2014
Revised accepted : 20 September 2014
Get Access
Citation :

B.R. MANJITH KUMAR and S.S. ANGADI. 2014. Influence of resource conservation technologies in maize-chickpea sequence cropping under Northern Transitional Zone of Karnataka. Green Farming  Vol. 5 (5) : 777-781  ;  September-October, 2014

ABSTRACT
A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2008-09 and 2009-10 at the Maize Agricultural Research Station, University of agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to study the influence of resource conservation technologies in maize- chickpea sequence cropping. Three different tillage methods viz., conventional tillage, minimum tillage and zero tillage were used in the main plots with two sub-plot treatments viz., no mulching and mulching along with three sub-sub plots viz., Unweeded check, Atrazine @ 1.25 a.i kg/ha for kharif and alachlor @ 1.25 l a.i/ha for rabi seasons and atrazine @ 1.25 kg a.i /ha followed by 2, 4- D @ 2.00 kg a.i /ha for maize and pendimethalin @ 1.00 l a.i /ha for chickpea. Based on the findings of experimentations, higher yield attributes and grain yield of maize were obtained in conventional tillage. Similar trend was observed in the succeeding chickpea crop during both the years. The maize and chickpea yield under conventional tillage was about 9.98 and 11.27 per cent respectively higher than zero tillage. Mulching with maize stover significantly increased the grain yield of maize and chickpea were to an extent of 4.35 and 5.88 per cent respectively. Significantly lowest total weed density and weed dry weight were recorded in conventional tillage than minimum and zero tillage. Conventional tillage recorded the lowest depletion of nutrients in weeds and minimum B:C ratio among tillage practices.
Key words :
Atrazine, Chickpea, Herbicide, Maize, Mulching, Sequence cropping, Tillage.