• +91 94611 45335
  • greenfarming@gmail.com
International Journal of Applied Agricultural & Horticultural Sciences
  • 28 April, 2024
Indexing :
           
Journal’s Code
Frequency : Bimonthly
Language : English
DOI Prefix : 10.37322
P-ISSN : 0974-0775
E-ISSN : 2582-4198
NAAS Rating
: 3.85 (2021)
Total Papers
: 2640
Total Views
: 849955
Impact Factor
SJIF (2018) : 6.967
IP Index : 2.07
GIF (2016) : 0.468
IIFS : 2.035
Current Issue
Green Farming
Green Farming
Vision Messages
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Green Farming
Copyright (c) 2010 Reserved
Announcement
  • 1. Papers are invited for the forthcoming issues of Green Farming. Few Mini Review articles on applied aspects of new approaches (with Sr. Authors) may be adjusted, if sent on priority by email. For more details, please contact us.
Vol. 11 (6) : Nov - Dec 2020 Issue
Green Farming Vol. 11 (6 ) : 539-544 ; Nov-Dec, 2020
Transaction cost in sharing, selling and purchasing groundwater : An economic analysis
DEEPA, M. P. M1* and P. S. SRIKANTHA MURTHY2
Department of Agric. Economics, University of Agricultural of Sciences, Bengaluru - 560065 (K.T.)
Designation :  
1 Res. Scholar, 2 Professor. *(deepapalb7004@gmail.com)
Subject : Agriculture Botany
Paper No. :
Total Pages : 6
Received : 8 Nov. 2020
Revised accepted : 5 Dec. 020
Get Access
Citation :

DEEPA, M. P. M and P. S. SRIKANTHA MURTHY. 2020. Transaction cost in sharing, selling and purchasing groundwater: An economic analysis Green Farming Vol. 11 (6): 539-544. Nov. -Dec. 2020.

ABSTRACT
Transaction cost (TnCs) of sharing (FShU), selling (FSeU) and purchasing (FPU) groundwater for irrigation was analyzed in Chitradurga and Tumkuru districts of Karnataka. Transaction cost analysis has shown that FSeU farmers experienced higher TnC of D.16764.25 followed by FPU (D.16308) and FShU farmers (D.12943.75). Element that formed major component of TnC in all the three water user categories was, the opportunity cost of conflict or dispute resolution. Any disputes aroused were solved at farmers' level in the study area without approaching the local legal system. Total irrigation cost of the farm increased by 9.85 per cent, 5.83 per cent and 6.38 per cent respectively in FShU, FSeU and FPU water user categories due to transaction costs. Net return per rupee of irrigation water decreased from D. 5.53 to D. 4.95 in FShU, from D. 1.53 to D. 1.39 in FSeU and from D. 2.57 to D. 2.36 in FPU categories. In spite of including TnC, net returns were high in case of FShU category as compared to other three water user categories. It shows that, groundwater sharing can be a potential system to reduce irrigation costs and realize higher net returns.
Key words :
Dispute resolution, Net returns, Transaction cost, Oopportunity cost and Total irrigation cost.